Send your feedback:

ISSUE 9.24
Jun. 11, 2010

12/12 | 12/05 | 11/28 | 11/21


News :
What happened?
Legislative Agenda :
Back on Tuesday
Radar Screen :
Mop possibly needed
Palmetto Politics :
Sanford wins! Sanford wins!
Commentary :
Scent of kerosene shows enormity of spill
Spotlight :
Electric Cooperatives of South Carolina
Feedback :
Worry about efficient government instead
Scorecard :
Up, down and in the middle
Photo Vault :
Up in the air
Stegelin :
Giving him the hook
Megaphone :
Big week for quotes
Statewide candidates :
Info on the runoff candidates

© 2002 - 2014, Statehouse Report LLC. All Rights Reserved. South Carolina Statehouse Report is published weekly.

News tips or calendar info?
the editor.

Phone: 843.670.3996

General e-mail




powered by



That’s how many votes short state Rep. Nikki Haley (R-Lexington) was from winning the GOP gubernatorial primary outright on Tuesday. Haley, who had been considered the early dark horse, garnered 206,303 votes out of a cast 422,178. She will now be in a June 22 run-off with U.S. Congressman Gresham Barrett (R-S.C.) who received 91,814 votes.  More.


Big week for quotes

“We knew from the beginning it was us versus the establishment. We were settling (in South Carolina) for a Republican House, a Republican Senate, a Republican governor. I won’t stop until we get a conservative House, a conservative Senate, a conservative governor.”
-- GOP gubernatorial candidate Rep. Nikki Haley (R-Lexington) speaking about uniting state government after advancing in the lead to a runoff two weeks from now.  More.
“Can you see Henry McMaster-type voters supporting this lady? If she’s the nominee, it’s going to be like rolling a hand grenade into the state (GOP) convention.”
-- Neal Thigpen, GOP activist and former political scientist, scoffing at the idea of Nikki Haley being able to keep the state party together. More.
"No white folks have an 'e' on the end of Green. The blacks after they left the plantation couldn't spell, and they threw an 'e' on the end."
-- Failed gubernatorial candidate and state Rep. Robert Ford (D-Charleston), on why fellow blacks were able to identify little-known candidate for U.S. Senate Alvin Greene as also being black. Greene shocked the state by defeating a former state representative and judge, Vic Rawl, for the Democratic spot to challenge U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) in November.  More.
“This is not a Republican Party.  This is a libertarian party. This is nothing but politics. I’m not resigning. I could care less.”
-- State Sen. Jake Knotts (R-W. Columbia) responding to news that the Lexington Republican Party voted to censure him and ask for his resignation after he referred last week to gubernatorial candidate and state Rep. Nikki Haley (R-Lexington) as a “raghead.” Haley is of Indian descent.  More.



The humble chicken has risen from the obscurity of the barnyard to the summit of South Carolina agriculture. In the late twentieth century the poultry industry (broilers, turkeys, and eggs) became the state’s leading agribusiness, contributing $500 million annually to the state’s economy.

But before chickens and turkeys were cash crops, they were part of the culture. Native Americans raised turkeys long before Europeans and Africans came to South Carolina, and chickens arrived with the first settlers. Soon chickens were the most common domestic animal in South Carolina, and virtually every farm family raised poultry for its own table and sold surplus eggs and fowl to townsfolk. This pattern of husbandry persisted nearly three centuries. Predictably, poultry earned an honored place in the region’s cuisine: fried chicken, chicken and dumplings, chicken bog, and pilau became celebrated staples of the Carolina diet.

Poultry evolved from a subsistence activity to a business in the 1930s. Farmers fleeing boll-weevil-infested cotton fields experimented with poultry as a cash crop. Production of broilers (chickens ten to twelve weeks of age at processing) rose from a mere 300,000 head in 1934 to 14 million by 1952 and to 48 million by the 1980s. The South Carolina poultry industry followed the pattern developed in Georgia by J. D. Jewell in the 1940s. Farmers entered partnerships with poultry processors, providing land, buildings, and equipment; processors furnished baby chicks, feed, vaccines, and veterinary services. Farmers fed and cared for the chicks until market weight was achieved. Processors collected the fowl and paid farmers based on weight gain. Processors then slaughtered, dressed, packaged, and delivered birds to market. Farmers typically raised four broods each per year.

The poultry industry experienced phenomenal growth in the 1980s and 1990s. … Observers credit automation and mass production for keeping consumer prices low, making poultry a bargain. Cultural influences were also factors. Health-conscience consumers made chicken and turkey centerpieces of the trendy low-fat cuisine that swept the country in the 1990s. In 2001 broilers, turkeys, and eggs ranked first, fifth, and seventh, respectively, of South Carolina’s top-ten commodities.

– Excerpted from the entry by Eldred E. Prince Jr. To read more about this or 2,000 other entries about South Carolina, check out The South Carolina Encyclopedia by USC Press. (Information used by permission.)


Info on the runoff candidates

Two candidates endorsed by Statehouse Report (Vincent Sheheen, Democrat, for governor; Frank Holleman, Democrat, for state superintendent) won their primaries on Tuesday.  Another endorsee (Leighton Lord, Republican, for attorney general) made it to a runoff. 

Below are links to candidate statements in the remaining primary runoffs to consider.  Next week, we'll make further endorsements.  Key: (dnr) means "Did not reply" to our survey.  (+) indicates the candidate endorsed by Statehouse Report.  
Republican primary
Lieutenant governor
Republican primary
Attorney general
Republican primary
State superintendent
Republican primary


Palmetto Priorities Statehouse Report encourages state leaders to develop and implement Palmetto Priorities involving several issues to make the state better a better place. Click the link to learn more about our suggestions for bipartisan policy objectives.

Here is a summary of our Palmetto Priorities:

CORRECTIONS: Reduce the prison population by 25 percent by 2020.

EDUCATION: Cut the state's dropout rate in half by 2020.

ELECTIONS: Increase voter registration to 75 percent by 2015.

ENVIRONMENT: Adopt a state energy policy that requires energy producers to generate 20 percent of energy from renewable sources by 2020.

ETHICS: Overhaul state ethics laws.

HEALTH CARE: Ensure affordable and accessible health care.

JOBS: Develop a Cabinet-level post to add, retain 10,000 small business jobs per year.

POLITICS: Have a vigorous two- or multi-party political system of governance.

ROADS: Strengthen all bridges and upgrade state roads by 2015.

SAFETY: Cut the state's violent crime rate by one-third by 2016.

TAX REFORM: Remove outdated special interest sales tax exemptions as part of an overall reform of the state's tax structure to be completed by 2014.


Subscriptions to Statehouse Report are now free. Click here to subscribe.


Every week in our new My Turn section, we seek guest commentaries on issues of public and policy importance to South Carolina. If you're interested, click here to learn more.


Become an underwriter

Statehouse Report is an underwriter-supported legislative forecast with new added features that provide more information about what’s going to happen at the SC General Assembly and in state government.

Organizations and companies that underwrite the publication receive a host of exciting benefits through branding, information spotlights and more.

To learn more about our exciting transformation and how your organization or business can benefit, click here. Or give us a holler on the phone at: 843.670.3996.

Statehouse Report -- making it easier to learn more about state politics and policy.


What happened?

S.C. primary provided answers, more questions

JUNE  11, 2010 - - Anyone who says they understood what led to Tuesday’s surprising state GOP gubernatorial primary results and what they will mean to the future of state politics, probably has one of two things in their garage: a time machine or a crystal ball.

That gubernatorial candidate state Rep. Nikki Haley (R-Lexington) garnered the most votes in the GOP primary came as little surprise to most, as she had been consistently polling at the top of the Republican field for the past month.
Cast as the “outsider,” Haley surprised many by falling only a few thousand votes short of winning the four-way primary outright over three other “establishment” GOP candidates - - Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer (12.5 percent), state Attorney Henry McMaster (16.9 percent), and U.S. Rep. Gresham Barrett (21.8 percent).
As a result of her strong showing (48.9 percent), many watchers are now labeling Haley as the presumptive winner of the Republican race. Considering her momentum, a defeat of Barrett , who received less than half the number of votes as Haley,may be a foregone conclusion in the GOP primary run-off one and a half weeks away from now.
From bottom to top

How did Haley go from worst to first, and with a massive lead at that? Was it, as academics have claimed, voter anger originating at the federal level and trickling down to the state level? Was it a Tea Party insurrection? Voter anger at incumbents? Would a Gov. Nikki Haley have worse relations with the legislature than does Gov. Mark Sanford? What about looming tax increases?  These and other questions abound.
Winthrop University’s Scott Huffmon, one of the state’s leading political scientists, said Haley was a “fresh face” that voters fed up with national and state woes would find attractive.
If Haley does defeat the more moderate Barrett, she could face stiff competition against state Sen. Vincent Sheheen (D-Kershaw) in November to replace Gov. Mark Sanford, according to pundits, academics, politicos and some state politicians speaking on background.

Sheheen, who won his three-way race handily with nearly 59 percent of the vote, is known as a moderate with a strong understanding of government and deep family roots in state government. Sheheen is, in many ways, the antithesis of Sanford.

Interesting challenges for Haley

And that may set up an interesting battlefront for Haley, who has walked in lock-step with the governor on most issues, but has since tried to distance herself from the man since news last year of his affair with a South American woman became an international joke.

Haley’s facing a tough balancing act, according to USC political scientist Mark Tompkins. On one hand, she will need to keep near their shared ideals - - limited government, tight-fisted budgeting - - that got her Tea Party support and Sanford reelected in 2006. At the same time, she will have avoid coming off as the heir to Sanford’s failures - - statewide jobs and economy drops, lost ground in the fight to restructure state government, and others.

In a sense, Haley will have to run as an anti-incumbent incumbent. And that could be trouble as anti-incumbency attitudes were rife throughout this primary. Witness the sending home of three GOP House members, Treasurer Converse Chellis, and a near miss for House Ways and Means chairman Rep. Dan Cooper (R-Piedmont), who won by 130 votes over a college student.

“I don’t think it was the Tea Party.  Those people have always been here,” said S.C. Democratic Party Chair Carol Fowler. “That is just what they’re calling themselves this year.”

Bob Jones University political science professor Linda Abrams said it was a “frightful” thought that former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s recent endorsement could have been the “catalyst” to Haley’s rise. “What that says about our state,” worried Abrams, who said she was calmed by the knowledge that third-party efforts don’t last more than one election cycle.

Frostier days ahead?

A Haley victory over Sheheen could mean for frostier relations with the legislature where most agree she is already disliked and distrusted by House leadership. Additionally with a populist surge, Haley could continue Sanford’s efforts at replacing moderate Republicans in the General Assembly with more Libertarian-minded allies.

Haley’s initial success has already upset some apple carts within the legislature. One Statehouse denizen, speaking on background, confirmed this week that work has already begun on state government restructuring bills that would increase the work of the governor, though not necessarily his or her powers.

At the same time, the bills would also increase legislative oversight of state agencies, as well as split up the duties of the Budget and Control Board, a constant target of Sanford’s. The latter could be the most important, politically, according to Tompkins.

With the wing of the Budget and Control Board that oversees redistricting in the hands of the legislature, Tompkins said House Speaker Bobby Harrell (R-Charleston) and Senate President Pro Tempore Glenn McConnell (R-Charleston) would have an easier time maintaining control and power.

Should that redistricting wing of the Budget and Control Board slip into a governor’s hands, Tompkins said that legislative brass would have a harder time asserting leverage over their underlings, because they would not be able to use re-drawing an incumbent’s district as an incentive “to play ball” on bills they wanted pushed through or disappeared.

Haley’s success so far poses the biggest threat to Harrell’s lock on power, according to Huffmon, who said House members, already miffed about his perceived faults this session, could become further restless if they blame him for their former colleagues not surviving the primary, especially Speaker Pro Tempore Harry Cato (R-Travelers Rest).

Crystal ball:  Regardless of who wins the June 22 GOP run-off, down-ballot Republican candidates will likely be forced to tack hard to the right, due to fears aroused by Haley’s strong primary showing. Legislators also may be more likely to postpone a called-for tax increase next year to cover looming state revenue shortfalls until the following year when the cuts will really be felt.
Legislative Agenda

Back on Tuesday

The General Assembly will reconvene Tuesday at noon as part of its session-extending sine die resolution to deal with roughly $300 million in gubernatorial vetoes within the proposed 2010-11 fiscal year General Fund budget, as well as other pending conference committee reports. The extra session is expected to take two days.
In related meetings, a workgroup of the Taxation Realignment Committee (TRAC) will meet Wednesday at 10:30 a.m. in 105 Gressette.  More.
On June 22, the state primary run-offs will be held for both parties. For full primary results, refer to’s helpful Web site.
Radar Screen

Mop possibly needed

Next week’s budget veto fight in the General Assembly will be a barometer of the level of fighting the next two years in the legislature. If the Dems vote to sustain Sanford’s 107 vetoes, then get a mop. No, get two.
Palmetto Politics

Sanford wins! Sanford wins!

In the dusky hours of his eight-year tenure, Gov. Mark Sanford issued a series of budget vetoes that can only be described with one word. Smart.

Sanford issued vetoes for 107 line items and provisos, which can be broken down into two lump sums. His biggest individual zap was a $214 million line-item for state health care spending that was dependent on an equal sum being sent down from the federal government that is expected to pass but hasn’t yet. The second lump was about $100 million and cut a wide swath through the budget, like doing away with the board for the state’s tech school system, the arts council, critical ETV funding, DHEC’s administration, extension services for black farmers, the state film office and provisos dealing with non-recurring funding.
By going after specific programs he’s always railed against, like the $25 million he wants cut from the Budget and Control Board, and by limiting the total dollar amount of his vetoes, Sanford may be guaranteeing  himself a series of overwhelming victories, finally, observers say. This will likely be a far cry from the time early on when he vetoed the entire budget in one fell swoop, only to see his political drama stolen by a single up/down override vote in the legislature.

By focusing his vetoes this go-round, Sanford may have dealt a death blow to the Budget and Control Board, as well as forcing his foes in the GOP and Democratic parties to turn on themselves. Because of the fractious nature of the Republican Party’ s tenuous hold on the House and with Tea Party supporters emboldened and Democrats furious, there’s a real possibility that the vast majority of his vetoes will be sustained, insiders say.  Those overrides with the “best” chance of being killed may be the ones further cutting state support of Clemson, reducing Senate and House staffs, doing away with a chunk of state dollars sent to local election commissions to help run elections, and a series of vetoes where Sanford may have overstepped the legal bounds of veto power, according to one Senate staffer.

What are the House Dems gonna do?

This is the first June in eight years where Gov. Mark Sanford and Democrats in the House will be major players, agreed House Minority Leader Harry Ott (D-St. Matthews) this week.

With leverage in the budget veto override/sustain fight next week, the Democrats find themselves in an interesting spot. If they vote to sustain Sanford’s vetoes, they create a crisis that their candidate for governor, state Sen. Vincent Sheheen (D-Kershaw), could take advantage of against the presumptive GOP gubernatorial candidate, Rep. Nikki Haley of Lexington. But if they do that, they could see cuts to programs they hold dear, cuts that could affect directly their constituents.

Having overplayed their hand earlier this session by opposing a budget scramble to fund the state courts and been severely spanked by vengeful Republicans, what will they do now with the lever in hand?

“We’re not going to say right now what we’re going to do next week,” Ott said. “Democrats want some things; Republicans want some things. We’re going to get together next week and work it out.”

One argument would be that voting to sustain the vetoes, while initially damaging to constituents, could be the most prudent move to take because it would move up to this year the debate in the legislature of how to handle next year’s projected $1 billion shortfall. That could force Republicans, loath to raise or create taxes in this state, to deal more directly with the looming crisis.

The question within the GOP may be when, not if, to raise taxes. If party members allow increases in next year’s session, which comes before the projected shortfall hits, they could take a beating from voters in 2012 who would not have felt the effects of the shortfall. If they wait until 2012 when crafting the 2012-13 fiscal year budget, they might not be able to control the angry backlash of voters who finally realize what it means to do without state services or pay more.  Smart money is on a deal or two getting cut behind closed door.

Dirty politics?

On top of a GOP voter backlash against Republican incumbents and votes for the “anti-establishment” gubernatorial candidate Rep. Nikki Haley (R-Lexington), you’d think the mainline wing of the state GOP had the worst primary results on Tuesday. Think again.

Even losing three incumbents in the House -- Speaker Pro Tem Harry Cato of Travelers Rest, Keith Kelly of Woodruff and Jim Stewart of Aiken -- GOP losses paled in comparison to the gaffe within their counter-party. The Democrats selected an unknown, Alvin Greene,  as its candidate to contend with incumbent U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint (R) in the upcoming election.

What’s the problem? Greene, according to media reports, is facing felony obscenity charges.  He is   unemployed and ran no observable campaign to defeat Vic Rawl, a former judge, state representative, and current county councilman who’d run a professional campaign.

Some contended that Greene’s race – he is black -- played a major role, and that his name came first on the down-ticket ballot. U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC) has called for an official investigation into Greene’s campaign, which he said could have been the result of Republican “shenanigans.”

If it was a case or dirty politics, it wouldn’t be the first time, not in South Carolina. In 1990, in an attempt to get out the Republican vote, GOP political operative Rod Shealy put up the money for the campaign of a black fisherman, posing him for campaign shots in front of a Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant.  

The state Democratic Party has asked Greene to step down, due to his legal issues, and he has refused. Two years ago, state Democrats were up in arms over the candidacy of Bob Conley, a former Republican who switched parties and won a primary race to face U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) in the General Election. State Democratic Party Chair Carol Fowler said at the time she couldn’t control who ran for office in her party.  After the Greene debacle this week, she made a similar statement.

Scent of kerosene shows enormity of spill

By Andy Brack, editor and publisher

JUNE 11, 2010 -- The hint of kerosene in the air of Mobile Bay lingered, replacing expected salty sea breezes as a reminder of the massive size and impact of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

It wasn't an overpowering scent we found during a trip earlier this month, but a faint fragrance similar to what you might smell a few minutes after spraying WD-40 on a squeaky door.

This mess in the Gulf is impacting people’s lives across the country. It’s on the tips of people’s tongues at meetings, churches, coffee shops and office water coolers from the Gulf states to California and beyond.

People feel helpless. Yes, they can send money to an aid group or conservation organization. But someone sitting in Sumter or Atlanta or Raleigh can’t actually DO much of anything else. They’re told not to volunteer because clean-up crews need specialized training.

People are frustrated that things are moving so slowly. They don’t know how to get out of the Groundhog Day-like water torture of oil - - the slow, constant landfall of everything from tarballs and goo-covered detritus to oily seaweed and occasional globs of muck.

On the trip to the Alabama and Florida coasts, I didn't see a bunch of goo on any of the white sandy beaches that are as typical of the Gulf coast as sugar is in sweet tea. But what I did see was disturbing. Some observations:
  • People are very worried about what the oil is going to do to the tourism and fisheries businesses along the coast. And they're more worried about the impact of the spill for wildlife.

  • But they're apparently not worried enough yet not to swim in the water. It was surprising how people would bathe in the clear, green waters as crews periodically combed beaches for pea-sized tarballs.

  • Contract crews were spotted in makeshift haz-mat suits – yellow plastic boots that were duct-taped to their pants. The stuff they picked up seemed small – no larger than a silver dollar, one observer said. It wasn't hard to wonder whether these crews were on beaches more for public relations purposes than for significant clean-up work.

  • The red and yellow strings of boom around parts of the shoreline seemed pretty flimsy, making us wonder just how much oil they can keep out.
Along Mobile Bay, 77-year-old Peck Thompson, a retired sheet rock worker, fished for croaker. He said he wasn't too sure how much longer he'd be able to fish like he'd been doing for the last 60 years.

“It's a disaster right now,” said Thompson, who lives over a bait shop near Dauphin Island, Ala. “It's going to shut a lot of businesses down – bait shops and stuff and the people who make their business fishing.”

Moments later at a beach in Gulf Islands National Seashore, 36-year-old Larry Femrite of Pensacola was walking off the beach with a camera. He explained he had just left an overnight shift at a nearby WalMart and was on his way home. In recent days, he had started to stop to check to see what he could see of the spill on the beaches. On Saturday, he said he saw oily specks washing ashore. On Sunday, he didn't see much of anything, other than a goo-covered empty Gatorade bottle that washed ashore.

“It should be a wake-up call to the oil companies and government,” Femrite said. “They should have better procedures in place in case something happens. I don't know if the ecosystem will ever recover.”

A couple of miles away, National Park Service Ranger Mark Whipps dug into the sand near the tide line to see if any oil detritus had been buried in the white sand. “I'm extremely ecstatic that it's not deep,” said Whipps, normally stationed at the Natchez Trace national park in Tupelo, Miss.

As about 20 contract workers prepared to look for oil pollution on the beach, he noted, “One of the good things since I've been here is the crews have gotten here right away. It's kind of an ongoing process.”

If you'd like to see more pictures of the trip, visit a new photo blog that will chronicle what's happening along the Gulf. Go to:

Electric Cooperatives of South Carolina

The public spiritedness of our underwriters allows us to bring SC Statehouse Report to you at no cost. This week's spotlighted underwriter is the Electric Cooperatives of South Carolina. More South Carolinians use power from electric cooperatives than from any other power source. South Carolina’s 20 independent, consumer-owned cooperatives deliver electricity in all 46 counties to more than 1.5 million citizens. As member-owned organizations, cooperatives recognize their responsibility to provide power that is affordable, reliably delivered and responsibly produced. More at or

Worry about efficient government instead

To Statehouse Report,

First let me state that I would like think that I am independent in my political leanings. I'll listen to Rush and Chris Mathews and take what each says with a grain of salt.

But the Statehouse Report article by Andy Brack (Commentary, 6/4) in Sunday’s paper was a quite deceiving. Basically he stated that in order to have "effective government" we should be paying more in taxes. That since South Carolina is ranked 37th nationwide in tax burden we shouldn't complain about paying higher taxes in order to have this so called "effective government".

As though just throwing money at our problems will solve them. Sorry Mr. Brack, this has been tried and it doesn't work. What he failed to mention was that, New Jersey, New York and California were ranked 1st, 2nd and 6th on this same tax burden list. I don't think any of these states could ever be considered good examples of "effective government" in any form or fashion. In fact South Carolina's budget problems pale in comparison to these three states. He also fails to mention that according to the 2007 United States Census Bureau South Carolina ranked 47th in personal income, where as New Jersey, New York, and California are ranked 2nd,4th,and 7th respectively.

From this data, my simple mind tells me we are already paying our fair share in taxes. I think Mr. Brack needs to learn a new term. How about a more "efficient government" or maybe a more "responsible government."

South Carolinians don't need to be taxed more, We just need the state to be more efficient in its operation and more responsible in the spending of our tax dollars. Sometimes I think them good ole boys in Columbia forget just who is footing the bill. In the meantime if Mr. Brack feels guilty about the amount of tax he pays, he could always voluntarily pay more. But for me enough is enough.

-- Pat Rush, Florence, S.C.

NEED TO VENT or mad about something we wrote? Send us a letter to the editor and we'll print it (as long as it isn't libelous!). Please include your name and town for identification purposes.

Send up to 200 words to


Up, down and in the middle

Sanford. If you had vetoed the entire budget, you would have thrown the process into a death spiral.  Instead, you come off more like a statesman and still get close to killing-off a foe, the Budget and Control Board. More.

Only 25 percent of registered voters showed up for the primary, but one of them was 101-year-old Minnie Wilson Bivens of Columbia, who was alive with the 19th Amendment passed.

Alvin Greene.
What’s sadder? That Mr. Greene doesn’t appear capable of completely explaining his candidacy for U.S. Senate? Or that his candidacy could be the result of GOP trickery? Or that the milquetoast S.C. Democratic Party can’t control who runs for office? Answer: All of the above. 

Did any of us really see Nikki Haley coming?  Or for that matter, what about Alvin Greene?

Photo Vault

Up in the air

Step into the wayback machine to pick out the Upstate congressman in this photo, who is on an official trip in 1960 to Antarctica.  Click the photo to learn more.

From The Vault is a partnership between Statehouse Report and the South Carolina Political Collections at USC Libraries. To learn more about the Collection's holdings, click here. You also might want to check out its blog: A Capital Blog. Let us know what you think about our new feature: Email Statehouse Report.

Giving him the hook

Also from Stegelin: 6/4 | 5/28 | 5/21 | 5/14

Statehouse Report

Editor and Publisher: Andy Brack
Senior Editor: Bill Davis
Contributing Photographer: Michael Kaynard

Phone: 843.670.3996

© 2002 - 2014 , Statehouse Report LLC. Statehouse Report is published every Friday by Statehouse Report LLC, PO Box 22261, Charleston, SC 29413.
Excerpts from The South Carolina Encyclopedia are published with permission and copyrighted 2006 by the Humanities Council SC. Excerpts were edited by Walter Edgar and published by the University of South Carolina Press. Statehouse Report has partnered with USC Press to provide readers with this interesting weekly historical excerpt about the state. Republication is not allowed. For additional information about Statehouse Report, including information on underwriting, go to