S.C. Statehouse Report
Sunday, Jan. 30, 2005
VIEW: http://www.statehousereport.com/columns/05.0130.retire.htm

State retirement system isn't broke, but fixes may be needed

By Andy Brack
SC Statehouse Report

JAN. 30, 2005 - - Many state employees and retirees may have choked on their morning coffee when they read about a $420 million error recently uncovered at the state retirement system.

Relax. A big pot of money isn't missing. The error occurred in financial forecasting. It's not about the accounting of money in any state account. Here's what happened:

The state has about $24 billion in its retirement system for employees. Not only does it earn interest, but current employees and the state pay a fixed percentage into the account every paycheck.

But to ensure the long-term viability of the system, the state office that manages the retirement system (unassumingly called S.C. Retirement Systems), does long-term forecasts to figure out whether there will be enough money over time to continue to pay benefits.

These long-term forecasts are done by actuaries, not accountants. They're the guys you might see portrayed in movies as the sallow people who consider all sorts of statistics to determine how long people will live so they can forecast how long they'll have to pay benefits. With 300,000 people in the system, there are a lot of equations, assumptions and calculations.

Until recently, the state's actuaries forecasted a long-term liability of 27 years, which meant if everybody's claims had to be paid out in one big lump sum (which doesn't happen because everybody doesn't die on one day), then it would take 27 years to pay off the debt incurred to fund the lump sum.

But recently, a new team of actuaries found a former team made a couple of assumptions with which they didn't agree. In turn, that changed the long-term forecast and the unfunded liability. The difference -- $420 million. And here's what it meant to the payback period - it extended it from 27 years to 28 years.

"No one has lost $420 million," said Peggy Boykin, who runs S.C. Retirement Systems.

Where all of this financial talk gets tricky and more confusing is when you throw in the long-term costs of cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs, for retirees.


McLEMORE'S WORLD: Way for the Secretary of State to relax

SCORECARD: Thumbs up/down and mixed reviews



We encourage your feedback. If you'd like to respond to something in SC Statehouse Report, please send us an e-mail. We reserve the right to edit for length and clarity. One submission allowed per month. Submission of a comment grants permission to us to reprint. Please keep your comment to 250 words or less:


Under the current system, COLAs are funded by the General Assembly. When forecasters make their calculations about long-term unfunded retirement liabilities, they don't assume COLAs will be added. But when they are, COLAs increase the unfunded liability of the retirement system. That makes sense. If you increase a benefit but the same amount of money essentially is coming in from current employees, there will be more liability down the road.

The public policy problem now is that state law, based on Internal Revenue Service standards, sets the unfunded liability limit at 30 years to keep the system sturdy. With the state now approaching that firewall, there's not enough wiggle room to give a 3.4 percent COLA this year because it would raise the liability to 32 years, which the state can't do. The law also doesn't allow the state to give a partial COLA.

Bottom line: The state will have to give serious consideration to making changes to the state retirement system to provide more flexibility.

"The option of doing nothing is not a viable option," said State Sen. Thomas Alexander, an Oconee County Republican who is chairing a special Senate Finance subcommittee that this week started looking at the retirement system. "Our goal is to maintain the soundness and viability of the retirement system for retirees and current employees who will become retirees."

Among the options they may consider in coming weeks are altering a popular program that allows employees to retire, but keep working at their current salary levels; increasing the amount the state pays for employee retirement (which would reduce the liability); returning the state to requiring 30 years of service for retirement instead of 28 as changed a few years ago; or reducing benefits.

One thing is for sure: the system isn't broke, but fixes and changes loom on the horizon.

CORRECTION: In last week's column, we suggested the State Board of Education was opposed to a plan to create a statewide charter school district. It, in fact, hasn't taken a position, according to a board member. The State Department of Education, however, testified against the plan in a legislative hearing. We regret the error.


130: The Secretary of State relaxing

A new cartoon from Bill McLemore


The best way to get South Carolina news is to augment your morning paper and TV show with SC Clips, a daily executive news summary compiled from more than 30 state newspaper and TV sources. It's delivered every business day and is packed with news of statewide impact, politics, business and more. Subscriptions are affordable at $30 per month -- and less for business subscribers. More: SC Clips.


Here's a "thumbs up" and "thumbs down" related to various political events from the past week:

Thumbs up

Richardson. Congrats to Beaufort County Republican Sen. Scott Richardson for endorsing a small tax hike to pay for road improvements.

Mixed reviews

License plates. It's good to hear that the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear a case that a lower court ruled South Carolina's "Choose Life" license plates to be unconstitutional. But it's disheartening to hear Sen. Mike Fair propose a "Choose Death" plate or Rep. John Graham Altman propose a "Choose Abortion" plate so the state can allow to offer the Life plate.

Deadbeat dads. Dads who don't pay child support should be ashamed of themselves, but for the state to spend $25 million to find them seems like a misplaced priority. How about if the money went directly to the children who have been hurt by deadbeat dads?

Thumbs down

Sanford. Thumbs down to the governor for using the bully pulpit of the State of the State to keep pushing two lame-brained ideas -- an income tax reduction plan that would hurt the state's long-term economic stability and a school voucher program which would undercut public education.

New Senate rules. In the first showdown on new rules adopted by the Senate, the chamber voted on a seat belt issue to pass over the rules. What's the point, then, of the change? More: Post and Courier.

How you can subscribe to the full edition of the report

The above version of S.C. Statehouse Report is the free edition. Our paid version, which costs about $100 per month, offer a weekly legislative forecast packed with information that can keep you and your business on the cutting edge.

Notes veteran lawmaker Sen. Glenn McConnell: "Statehouse Report gives an inside practical report of weekly problems with and progress of legislation. It reviews the whole landscape."

In each issue of Statehouse Report, you'll get::

Hot issue -- an early peek at weekly commentary on something really big. Last year, we continually beat other news organizations in finding major trends in issues, from teacher and budget cuts to wetlands proposals.

Agenda -- a weekly forecast of the coming week's floor agenda

Radar Screen -- a behind-the-scenes look at what's really going on in the General Assembly

McLemore's World -- an early view of our respected cartoonist Bill McLemore.

Tally Sheet -- a weekly review of all of the new bills introduced in the legislature in everyday language

Scorecard -- A Thumbs Up and Thumbs Down of major political/policy events for the week.

Calendar -- a weekly list of major meetings for the House, Senate and state agencies.

Megaphone -- a quote of the week that you'll find illuminating.

To learn more about subscriptions, contact Andy Brack at: brack@statehousereport.com


Learn more about Statehouse Report

  Copyright 2005, Statehouse Report LLC, which is affiliated with The Brack Group, Charleston, S.C.
Retransmission or reproduction of more than one copy is prohibited without express permission of the publisher. For additional information, including subscription prices, go to