|
S.C.
Statehouse Report
Sunday, March 20, 2005
VIEW: http://www.statehousereport.com/columns/05.0320.voucher.htm
COMMENTARY
Voucher
bill could lead to school resegregation
By
Andy Brack
SC Statehouse Report
MARCH
20, 2005 - - If people think the ill-named "Put Parents
In Charge" legislation backed by GOP Gov. Mark Sanford
is no big deal, they're wrong.
It is a big deal. Siphoning public money for private education
could lead to school resegregation, says the Rev. Joseph A.
Darby, the much-respected African American minister at Morris
Brown A.M.E. Church in Charleston. Many recall Darby, who
is first vice president of the S.C. NAACP, as the man who
gave invocations at the inauguration of Sanford and his predecessor,
Democratic Gov. Jim Hodges.
Darby sees Sanford's voucher proposal as one of the worst
education ideas to come along in a long time.
For years, Darby says, South Carolina hasn't adequately funded
public education, particularly in the rural areas. A lawsuit
brought by poorer school districts seeking fairer education
funding featured 16 months of testimony that wrapped up late
last year. A decision is expected this summer.
The
Rev. Joseph A. Darby
|
"I refuse to write off schools that have never been
given the chance to compete on a level playing field, and
find it hypocritical that those that refused to equitably
fund our schools decide to try 'something new' and blithely
calling it 'Putting Parents in Charge' to disguise a legislative
wolf in sheep's clothing," Darby wrote this week in an
e-mail to a voucher-backed group seeking support from black
preachers.
Darby said if money is drained now from public schools to
provide "tax credits" to parents who send their
kids to private schools, students in many public schools will
suffer consequences of already underfunded schools.
"It's a continuation of that same kind of paternalistic
thinking that South Carolina has always had, and that's what's
been holding us back," he said.
In the e-mail, he claimed the ballyhooed voucher effort is
little more than a frightening attempt to modernize two strategies
used in the 1960s to block school desegregation effort.
|
ALSO
THIS WEEK
McLEMORE'S
WORLD: Baseball on Capitol Hill
FEEDBACK:
Sanford's folly
SCORECARD:
Thumbs up/down and mixed reviews
SUBSCRIPTION
INFO
FEEDBACK
POLICY
We
encourage your feedback. If you'd like to respond to
something in SC Statehouse Report, please
send us an e-mail. We reserve the right to edit for
length and clarity. One submission allowed per month.
Submission of a comment grants permission to us to reprint.
Please keep your comment to 250 words or less:
feedback@statehousereport.com
|
"One of those was called 'freedom of choice,' which
allowed parents to send their children to any public school
that they pleased to slow down desegregation. The other, which
was ultimately outlawed by the U.S. Supreme Court, allowed
parents to have tax credits and scholarships to send their
children to all-white private schools created with the expressed
purpose of maintaining segregation.
"Those private schools, many of which now chase the
dollars that the present legislation would offer, served to
set public education back by decades in South Carolina, and
our Governor wants to abandon those public schools instead
of fixing them."
In an interview, Darby added, "It outrages me that 50
years after Brown v. Board of Education, the same strategies
used to fight Brown v. Board are being brought up by our elected
officials."
Tom Truitt, executive director of the Pee Dee Education Center
in Florence, said Darby is onto a strong argument.
"The obligation of the state is to provide an education
for all of the children and it makes no sense if we're going
to live in an integrated society to provide education in a
segregated manner."
He added the idea that tax credits (vouchers) for private
school education would help public schools is a notion "that
does not pass the common sense test."
Maybe the ills of vouchers are getting through to people
and politicians. In the past couple of weeks, Rep. Ronnie
Townsend, the Anderson Republican who chairs the House Education
and Public Works Committee, told constituents the Sanford
plan was merely a tax cut to help the wealthy that masqueraded
as an education bill, according to the SC Education Association.
Also, Rep. Jim McGee, R-Florence, disingenuously tried to
distance himself from the voucher idea in a recent letter
to a Florence newspaper, even though he's still a co-sponsor
of two versions of the voucher bill.
Finally, senior Senate sources claim the measure will get
nowhere this year.
Meanwhile, proponents of the measure seem to be using more
desperate tactics - - from writing fictitious letters to the
editor and threatening letters to school boards to working
stealthily to create support for the proposal among black
preachers and spending thousands of dollars on television
commercials.
If public school advocates don't remain vigilant and thwart
sneaky, hypocritical tactics, they may find voucher proponents
will lose the battle this year, but eventually win the war.
RECENT COMMENTARY
McLEMORE'S WORLD
3/20: Baseball
pitches to Capitol Hill
Another great cartoon from Bill McLemore:

LEARN MORE DAILY
The
best way to get South Carolina news is to augment your morning
paper and TV show with SC Clips, a daily executive
news summary compiled from more than 30 state newspaper and
TV sources. It's delivered every business day and is packed
with news of statewide impact, politics, business and more.
Subscriptions are affordable at $30 per month -- and less
for business subscribers. More: SC
Clips.
FEEDBACK
3/18: Writer outlines the "Sanford
Folly"
To the editor:
The Sanford Folly - Our Children Are Suffering While He Spins
In His Fantasy
No matter how you approach the proposition, it is wrong!
We have a duty and a responsibility as a free and democratic
people to educate our citizens.
This year I will complete over 31 years of continous military
service, including deployments in the Far East, Europe and
the Middle East during OIF. Freedom is not something I take
lightly, and I mean freedom for all of God's people.
I grew up in the segregated South, I remember those dark
times, and I regret we were so ignorant, so uncaring and selfish,
and still those sins haunt us today, and yes we still march
down that same darn road -- just look at that flag on the
Statehouse grounds. It is a reminder of that past, which is
still our present and the questions remains - "Will It
Be Our Future!" We do have a choice, let's do something
about it NOW! We owe it to our children, all children regardless
of race, creed or national origin!!!
Enough is enough!
-- Sandy Gibson, Lexington, S.C.
SOUTH CAROLINA SCORECARD
Here's a "thumbs up" and "thumbs down" related to various
political events from the past week:
Thumbs
up
The State newspaper. Congrats to The State
for spending the time and money to look behind campaign donations
and for putting a tool online to help people know who gives
to their lawmakers.
Darby. Hats off to the Rev. Joe Darby for speaking
up about how the school voucher bill may lead to school resegregation.
Mixed
signals
Rep. James Smith. Seems if you're going to put up
8,000 amendments to stall tort reform, it doesn't look good
to cave within a day.
State budget. Everybody seems ecstatic that the $5.9
billion state budget swiftly and unanimously passed in the
House. But it seems like there ought to be more debate about
spending that will affect so many.
Thumbs
down
SCRG. South Carolinians for Responsible Government,
the pro-voucher group, continues to spiral down with deceptive
and misleading political tactics in their at-all-costs strategy
to win a victory on school tax credits for private education.
Tort reform. A sweeping tort reform package has passed
the House and Senate and is on the way to the governor. While
some of the bill's provisions are good, such as tightening
venue rules and stemming frivolous lawsuits, we still worry
it will take away too many freedoms from hard-working South
Carolinians.
SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION
How you can subscribe to the full edition
of the report
The above version of S.C. Statehouse Report is the
free edition. Our paid version, which costs about $100 per
month, offer a weekly legislative forecast packed with information
that can keep you and your business on the cutting edge.
Notes veteran lawmaker Sen. Glenn McConnell: "Statehouse
Report gives an inside practical report of weekly problems
with and progress of legislation. It reviews the whole landscape."
In each issue of Statehouse Report, you'll get::
Hot issue -- an early peek at weekly commentary
on something really big. Last year, we continually beat
other news organizations in finding major trends in issues,
from teacher and budget cuts to wetlands proposals.
Agenda -- a weekly forecast of the coming week's
floor agenda
Radar Screen -- a behind-the-scenes look at what's
really going on in the General Assembly
McLemore's World -- an early view of our respected
cartoonist Bill McLemore.
Tally Sheet -- a weekly review of all of the new
bills introduced in the legislature in everyday language
Scorecard -- A Thumbs Up and Thumbs Down of major
political/policy events for the week.
Calendar -- a weekly list of major meetings for
the House, Senate and state agencies.
Megaphone -- a quote of the week that you'll find
illuminating.
To learn more about subscriptions, contact Andy Brack at:
brack@statehousereport.com
|