S.C. Statehouse Report
Sunday, Nov. 19, 2006
VIEW: http://www.statehousereport.com/columns/06.1119.dems.htm


The South and Democrats
By Andy Brack
Publisher
SC Statehouse Report

NOV. 19, 2006 - - A Maryland political science professor this week wrote a provocative column in Salon.com that suggested the national Democratic Party needed to write off the South.

Interesting notion, but he's flat wrong. In fact, he's got it backwards. Not only do Democrats need the South, but the South needs Democrats, Republicans and independents.

In "Do Democrats need the South?" Thomas F. Schaller says, "For the first time in 50 years, the party that controls both chambers of Congress is a minority party in the South. And in the last four presidential elections, the Democratic candidate has either garnered 270 electoral votes, the minimum needed to win, or has come within one state of doing so before a single Southern vote is tallied. Outside the old Confederacy, the nation is turning blue, and that portends a new map for a future Democratic majority."

Schaller may be correct in those assertions, but he's looking at trees instead of the forest. If the Democratic Party is to be truly a national party, it can't write off one region and represent everyone else. That's just not democratic (small d).

FEEDBACK POLICY

We encourage your feedback. If you'd like to respond to something in SC Statehouse Report, please send us an e-mail. We reserve the right to edit for length and clarity. One submission allowed per month. Submission of a comment grants permission to us to reprint. Please keep your comment to 250 words or less:

feedback@statehousereport.com

The Maryland professor points to several reasons to why Democrats struggle in the South: he says white voters seem to prefer white candidates over black ones (even though Mississippi, for example, reportedly has more black than white elected officials in local government than white ones.) He also says the South's social conservatism is due, in part, to the region being the most religious and rural in the country. Schaller further points to the region's small gender gap and low rate of unionism as contributing factors.

Those are all interesting, but Schaller needs to take this ostrich-like analysis out of the hole and look at practical politics. He seems to forget that in the recent election, the U.S. Senate likely would remain in GOP control if it were not for Southern Democrats and independents in Virginia. In fact, in the four Senate races in the "Old South," Democrats won two (Florida and Virginia) and Republicans won two (Tennessee and Mississippi).

Additionally, as pointed out by Chris Kromm of the Institute for Southern Studies, Democrats won 47 percent of 19 key Southern U.S. House races and were competitive in 63 percent of them. At the gubernatorial level, Democrats won in Tennessee and Arkansas.

Notes Kromm: "For Democrats to turn their backs on a region that half of all African-Americans and a growing number of Latinos and Asian-Americans call home, a place devastated by Hurricane Katrina, plant closings, poverty, and other indignities -- in short, for 'progressives' to give up on the very place where they could argue they are needed most -- would rightfully be viewed as a historic retreat from the party's commitment to justice for all.

"But most of all, November 6 proved that the 'forget the South' strategy is a colossal mistake -- if only because the elections revealed that, if they try, Democrats in the South can win."

There's another impact to consider. If Democrats ignored the South, they likely would cause political debate to be more polarized. By forgetting about the South, Democrats would become more liberal and Republicans would kowtow to being more conservative.

"It's a big country," said "Jethro" in an online comment to Schaller's article. "Dems can be competitive in every part of it, although they won't all look and sound the same. Why would we want them to?"

Yet another impact: If national Democrats bypassed the South, they would write off the next generation of leaders at statehouses and county councils. This could kill the progressive spirit that lingers in many communities across the region because there wouldn't be much of an apparatus to support candidates.

One of the outcomes of the recent election is that people seemed to be frustrated by one-party rule in Washington for the last few years. By leaving out one region that's growing like gangbusters, Democrats would be committing an egregious strategic error … and might end up losing power for good in years to come.

Americans - and South Carolinians - deserve robust political debate in Congress and the Statehouse. To expect less is to undercut democracy.

Send your comments to Andy Brack at brack@statehousereport.com. His book of commentary, Bugging the Palmettos, is available for $15.00. Click here for more.

Recent commentary

lighter side
11/19: A fellow in a job interview

Another great cartoon from Bill McLemore:

feedback
11/14: Missing Fritz

To the editor:

I noted on election night, [Congressman Jim] Clyburn got 97,000 votes usually he does 110 to 120,000+. Fritz [Hollings] used to fund the gotv efforts, yep in more ways than one we miss Fritz. SCETV should have had him for "color" commentary.

Want to join the pool on when Treasurer T-Rav [Thomas Ravenel] and Gov. [Mark] Sanford have their first Budget and Control Board smack-down tripping over each other to get to the TV camera. Old blue blood Charleston vs. Nouveau Charleston.

-- Lynn Bailey, Columbia, S.C.

Recent feedback

The best way to get South Carolina news is to augment your morning paper and TV show with SC Clips, a daily executive news summary compiled from more than 30 state newspaper and TV sources. It's delivered every business day and is packed with news of statewide impact, politics, business and more. Subscriptions are affordable at $30 per month -- and less for business subscribers. More: SC Clips.


How you can subscribe to the full edition of the report

The above version of S.C. Statehouse Report is the free edition. Our paid version, which costs about $100 per month, offer a weekly legislative forecast packed with information that can keep you and your business on the cutting edge.

Notes veteran lawmaker Sen. Glenn McConnell: "Statehouse Report gives an inside practical report of weekly problems with and progress of legislation. It reviews the whole landscape."

In each issue of Statehouse Report, you'll get:

  • Hot issue -- an early peek at weekly commentary on something really big. Last year, we continually beat other news organizations in finding major trends in issues, from teacher and budget cuts to wetlands proposals.
  • Agenda -- a weekly forecast of the coming week's floor agenda
  • Radar Screen -- a behind-the-scenes look at what's really going on in the General Assembly
  • McLemore's World -- an early view of our respected cartoonist Bill McLemore.
  • Tally Sheet -- a weekly review of all of the new bills introduced in the legislature in everyday language
  • Blogroll -- a weekly summary of the best of South Carolina political blogs.
  • Scorecard -- A Thumbs Up and Thumbs Down of major political/policy events for the week.
  • Calendar -- a weekly list of major meetings for the House, Senate and state agencies.
  • Megaphone -- a quote of the week that you'll find illuminating.

To learn more about subscriptions, contact Andy Brack at: brack@statehousereport.com

credits

South Carolina Statehouse Report

Publisher: Andy Brack
Editor Emeritus: Jerry Ausband
Assistant Editor: Betsy Brack

Phone: 843.670.3996 Fax: 843.722.9887

Subscription or sponsorship Inquiries: info@statehousereport.com

Have an event for the SC Statehouse Report calendar? E-mail details to: news@statehousereport.com or fax to above number.

For additional information, including subscription prices, go to http://www.statehousereport.com/.



Just a quick note to let you know how you missed out this week. If you were a subscriber to the paid edition of Statehouse Report, you would have received the information below on Friday AND you would have gotten other special features:

  • NUMBER OF THE WEEK: 75 percent
  • PALMETTO POLITICS: Election predictionrecap
  • SCORECARD: Ups and downs across the state
  • MEGAPHONE: About mandates and bright lights

For more information, contact us today about our affordable paid subscriptions for businesses and organizations that need the inside scoop at the Statehouse.

AVAILABLE NOW: Furman University's Don Gordon has great things to say about Andy Brack's new book of commentaries, "Bugging the Palmettos." Click here to learn more and buy the book -- only $15.00!

Visit Statehouse Report

ThinkSouth

A blog on ideas and news that is for Southern policy leaders, analysts and more.

 

  Copyright 2006, Statehouse Report LLC, which is affiliated with The Brack Group, Charleston, S.C.
Reproduction is prohibited without express permission of the publisher. For additional information, including subscription prices, go to
http://www.statehousereport.com/.